Train The Trainer

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Thursday, 21 March 2013

The problem with [Peak] Power [calculus] – or why I don’t believe in this Sacred Cow

Posted on 14:38 by Unknown

I am going to say it straight ahead – coaches who believe that they are training peak power at certain percentage of 1RM are simply misguided.




There are two important logical errors behind it [IMHO]. First one is the belief that there is a magic bullet – a certain % of 1RM intensity that will result in peak power output and in return training with that peak power output will result in great transfer [power and explosiveness] to all other zones or related activities (e.g. improving power using jump squats will improve sprint speed, jump height or even 1RM). Using that intensity you are training [mythical creature in Platonistic world of motor abilities] POWER. Using any other intensity you are not training power.

Second one is the belief that there is peak power. This peak power is TOTALLY dependent on the way/method it is being calculated. There could be 100+ methods of calculating it and all of them will result in different % of 1RM (Range: 0-80% 1RM). Let me expand. To get power, one needs two variables: instant velocity and instant force.

When it comes to velocity one could measure velocity of COM [Center of Mass] of both the athlete and barbell or only velocity of barbell. This will create different velocities. This could be also measured using 1-LPT [Linear Position Transducer], 2-LPT or 3D video analysis.

When it comes to force one could measure it using force plate directly or estimate it by using reverse dynamics [speed is derivative of position, acceleration is derivative of velocity and force is acceleration times mass involved] from positions derived by using LPTs. Also, estimating force from acceleration demands multiplying it with the moving mass. What is moving mass? Is it barbell only or body weight and barbell? Someone use 90% of body weight, some use 100% and some use 0%.

When we decide on all of these then we have range of movement. Are we going to use full concentric ROM or only part of it where acceleration is >0 [Fmuscles = Fgravity]? Or when Fmuscles start to actually break the movement (which actually happens with lighter loads – you engage the antagonists to stop the movement) and that the point where P [power] < 0.

Are we going to take into account average power over ROM or peak power over ROM?

Taking all of these into consideration it could be confidently said that the peak power concept is measurement/analysis dependent. And even if it existed I doubt that training at that intensity will provide a magical transfer to everything else that demands power output.

Another thing I actually hate is seeing this in studies. Researchers measured 1RM and power output at 50% or any other percentage of that 1 RM. Training over time improved 1RM. Then they measure power output at the same 50% or any other percentage of the new 1RM. Depending on the method of measurement (see the above) they might see statistically insignificant (don’t get me started on this B.S. concept) change in power output or even a drop. So they conclude that improving 1RM doesn’t (statistical) significantly improve power output. Well, duhhh. What about measuring it and comparing it at the same absolute weight, like P60kg (power output with 60kg)?

So, after all this rant what is the solution? One should do needs analysis and check what are the loads and resistances one needs to move during one’s sport. Then one needs to increase the SPEED and EXPLOSIVENESS at which one is able to move those around (including bodyweight). Improving this demands working over the full force-velocity continuum and applying different methods of training and not only trying to find peak power intensity that is going to magically improve everything else. First of all this isn’t going to happen and second it is measurement dependent and really hard to find. One exception to this rule might be cycling. They measure external power and they can manage the gears to take advantage of it. This peak power is usually around 80-100RPM (if I remember correctly), but the cyclist also train at cadences above/below that. 

To conclude - One needs to train to be more powerful (faster, more explosive) over a range of intensities  instead of focusing on one small zone.








  


Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in Biomechanics, strength training, Theory | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • 6 weeks running program for soccer players
    This is an article I wrote couple of months ago for one website, but it never got published, so I decided to publish it on my b...
  • Guest Article: Biological Planning, Organizing, and Programming for Physical Preparation. Part 2
    BIOLOGICAL PLANNING, ORGANIZING, AND  PROGRAMMING FOR PHYSICAL PREPARATION Part 2 Click HERE for part 1 Planning Working Backwards Many coa...
  • Research Review – Effects of different pushing speeds on bench press
    Research Review – Effects of different pushing speeds on bench press Rob Shugg from Kinetic Performance brought this very interesting study ...
  • Interview with Steve Magness
    Interview with Steve Magness In the last couple of years blog by Steve Magness “ Science of Running ” was more than the source of casual re...
  • Interview with Mike Boyle
      Interview with Mike Boyle There are four coaches that were highly influential on my physical preparation philosophy and practice. The firs...
  • Coincidence or not? Back to soccer
    While I was working on the 8-weeks pre-season plan for soccer  I have been contacted by the head coach of FC RAD , Marko Nikolić offering me...
  • MOTORIČKA ANALIZA ODBOJKAŠKE IGRE
    Seminarski rad koji sam napisao negde u Aprilu 2010. godine pre nego sam napisao Planning and programming of training in sport games . Neki ...
  • Periodization Confusion?
    I have recently been reading Transfer of Training  (Volume 2) by Dr Anatoly Bondarchuk an...
  • Playbook: Understanding MODERATION through simulation
    Playbook: Understanding MODERATION through simulation Playbook: Understanding MODERATION through simulation Introduction I rece...
  • Planning the Strength Training. Part 1
    Planning the strength training From novice to elite CHARACTERISTICS OF THE LIFTER According to Mark Rippetoe, the author of Practical Progra...

Categories

  • analysis
  • Basketball
  • Biomechanics
  • conditioning
  • dashboards
  • Download
  • ELEIKO
  • energy system development
  • Excel
  • Fasting
  • fun
  • general vs. specific
  • Good Reads
  • Guest Article
  • GymAware
  • HRV
  • IE20-10
  • injuries
  • interview
  • Italian
  • links
  • martial arts
  • MMA
  • monitoring
  • Muscles
  • Notice
  • Nutrition
  • Olympic lifting
  • On Serbian
  • Performance Analysis
  • periodization
  • Philosophy
  • Physical Therapy
  • Physiology
  • planning
  • powerlifting
  • Product
  • programming
  • Psychology
  • R
  • Random Thoughts
  • Research
  • Review
  • Roberto Sassi
  • RPE
  • RSA
  • runnings
  • screen cast
  • soccer
  • statistics
  • strength training
  • team sports
  • Theory
  • videos
  • visit
  • volleyball
  • Warm-up
  • wellness questionnaire

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (54)
    • ►  December (7)
    • ►  November (8)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (8)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ▼  March (7)
      • Does Speed Work work? My response to Mike Tuchsche...
      • Does Speed Work work? My response to Mike Tuchsche...
      • Is power/speed reading in clean and snatch counter...
      • The problem with [Peak] Power [calculus] – or why ...
      • [Research] Velocity Loss as an Indicator of Neurom...
      • Running based intervals – Velocities table [Update]
      • Running based intervals – Velocities table [Free D...
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2012 (55)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (9)
    • ►  September (9)
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  July (6)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (3)
  • ►  2011 (48)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (9)
    • ►  May (12)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (9)
  • ►  2010 (42)
    • ►  December (11)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (19)
    • ►  September (7)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile